Page 1 of 1

Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 9:46 am
by EZYLYF
Which do you use and why?
Brands?

Re: Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 12:26 pm
by Deek
I use both. Hard Mason for the basic leader and fluorocarbon for the tippet

Re: Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 3:55 pm
by Hillbilly
I use Tapered Mono for leaders, with Flouro Tippets.
Fluorocarbon is so much more abrasion resistant, and I have a Ladyfish/Trout habit. If Leader or Tippet gets short I replace as needed. I can make a leader last a long time that way. Of course before I change the Leader there may be two/three sizes of Flouro in it.
Only issue is that Flouro doesn't break down. Mono does after a long time. Most manuf have quit putting dates on Flouro.
I usually try to buy my Tippet material when it's on Sale! Then keep it in the dark, mono leaders the same. Because I have to go to Delaware for work, I buy from an Orvis Factory Outlet Store, just convenient.

That's just what I do, everybody has their own preferences. Not wrong just different.

Re: Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:50 am
by Evan
Everyone does it differently, but I construct my own leaders since they're both cheaper and more versatile. Usually use Seaguar blue label Fluoro for every piece, since it's by far the strongest and most abrasion-resistant leader I've found. I apply some chapstick to each end before tying them together (always with a Slim Beauty) so the knots slide more smoothly. If I'm fishing Gurglers I'll switch to mono since it floats, but beware of mono leaders degrading over time and breaking at inopportune moments.

Try this formula for an 8wt rod and you won't be disappointed:

7 feet of 40# Seaguar fluoro
Slim beauty knot to 3 feet of 30# Seaguar fluoro
Slim beauty knot to 2 feet of 15 or 20# Seaguar fluoro

Re: Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:43 pm
by BearsFan
Write down the date. I agree with Evan!

Mono for topwater, flouro for most of the rest. I like rio, seaguar, and yozuri in no particular order. Each has an application. I have found many of the cheaper ones suck, you definitely get what you pay for.

Re: Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 5:58 pm
by EZYLYF
Thanks guys, great information here. I have been using Seaguar Flouro with good luck and did some testing on mono to see how it worked. Overall I like the flouro better, but do feel mono has its place. Was using mono during the Salty Fly TX and lost a fish (one that would have looked excellent on our board ) at my feet just before landing, but after downsizing to 10# that day and the trout had some nice fangs I need to give mono its due respect.

As for the Hard mono, whats the difference between it and regular mono?

Re: Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 7:45 pm
by Todd
EZYLYF wrote:
As for the Hard mono, whats the difference between it and regular mono?
One is hard.

Re: Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 7:59 pm
by Rik
Sounds like a college educated donkey answer but actually shows wisdom gained only from experience.

Re: Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:05 pm
by EZYLYF
Todd wrote:
EZYLYF wrote:
As for the Hard mono, whats the difference between it and regular mono?
One is hard.

Why would I expect any less from you....Thanks for clearing that up for me....Lol
Todd if one is hard and one is regular, could we have a constipation problem here...

Re: Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:32 pm
by Todd
Hey, you asked. :lol:

This is somewhat of an explanation-

http://midcurrent.com/experts/soft-vs-h ... r-leaders/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:15 pm
by Rik
I was gonna suggest you hold both hard and soft in your hand as the difference is quite evident but I really didn't want to explain how I knew.

Re: Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:34 am
by EZYLYF
Rik wrote:I was gonna suggest you hold both hard and soft in your hand as the difference is quite evident but I really didn't want to explain how I knew.
Gotcha, I'm hoping it feels hard.

Re: Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:44 am
by BearsFan
Hard is used for fly leaders, soft is used in snoopy poles.

Re: Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:29 am
by Evan
BearsFan wrote:Write down the date. I agree with Evan!
:shock: The Devil better get a warm coat! Haha